The Human Holocaust

[Ragnar Danneskjöld]

The Human Holocaust
By Jonathan Awesome

Environmentalism is based on one fundamental idea, the intrinsic value of untouched nature. The value of nature, not too anyone, but for its own sake. The good, for those who accept environmentalism, is nature undisturbed by man. This is the essence of the whole ideology.
If nature untouched by man is of supreme value then man's use of anything in nature is the supreme evil. And because man lives by modifying nature; this implies that man's life is evil. Human survival is evil. Your survival and the effort it requires is evil, they are the essence of what evil is in the eyes of those who truly subscribe to environmentalism.
Many people call themselves environmentalists but do not know about theses implications or that the ideology is based on such principles. Most think that environmentalism is good for human life. These people are not evil just mistaken. But those who really understand their professed beliefs and live by them are aware of and even vocal about such things. Those at the heart of the movement are the real environmentalists and are out to destroy human life in terms of quality and quantity.

In the mid 1900s Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane was found to be an extremely cheap and effective insecticide. DDT was used against the spread of malaria and typhus by killing the insects which carry and transmit them to their victims. In 1972 because of the pressure of environmentalist DDT was banned in America resulting in a drop in production and use in the rest of the world.
The World Health Organization's website states that “There were an estimated 247 million cases of malaria and 881,000 deaths from the disease in 2006, mostly among children in Africa, making it one of the world's leading killers.” An article in the New York Times dated April 11, 2004 states “Independent malariologists believe it kills two million people a year, mainly children under 5 and 90 percent of them in Africa. Until it was overtaken by AIDS in 1999, it was Africa's leading killer. . . . those who survive are brain-damaged. Each year, 300 to 500 million people worldwide get malaria.”
An estimated 98,000,000 people have died of malaria since the banning of DDT. Ninety eight million people; an estimated 88,000,000 of whom were “pregnant women, or children under the age of five” are now dead because of environmentalists. Those deaths were preventable with the use of DDT. Environmentalist by banning DDT have killed almost one hundred million people.

Why have they done this? Rachel Louise Carson in 1962 wrote her book Silent Spring. The book spread the idea that DDT was harmful to people and animals, epically birds. She claimed, based on distorted correlation and absolutely no causal relation, that DDT caused birds to develop thinner egg shells.
From the American Council on Science and Health's Facts Versus Fears Edition 3, June 1998: “After many years of carefully controlled feeding experiments, Dr. M. L. Scott and associates of the Department of Poultry Science at Cornell University 'found no tremors, no mortality, no thinning of eggshells and no interference with reproduction caused by levels of DDT which were as high as those reported to be present in most of the wild birds where ‘catastrophic’ decreases in shell quality and reproduction have been claimed.'” This and other studies have proven the fraud of the thinning egg shell claim. And all other claims against DDT have similarly been disprove.
But even had this claim been true, had they not caused so much death for no reason but because DDT was harmful to birds, this would still be insanely monstrous. To value a handful of birds over tens of millions of human lives is by its self disgustingly evil.
Alexander King, a very prominent figure in the environmentalist movement (who although supporting DDT early on helped to get it banned) wrote "In Guyana, within almost two years, it had almost eliminated malaria, but at the same time, the birth rate had doubled. So my chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is that it greatly added to the population problem." statements such as this have been made by others. So the real reason for the banning of DDT was human death, for at least many of those who pushed for the ban. Human death because according to the fundamental principles of environmentalism, human life is evil. These aren't just some people misrepresenting a movement; this is the heart of the movement. This is people who take their ideas seriously and understand the deadly implications of them. They desire humans to die because they are environmentalists.

This is not the only case of the destruction of human life by environmentalists. From government regulations stifling economic production to eco-terrorists destroying property and threatening murder; environmentalism is destructive to both the quality of human life and human life itself.

To see through the fraud of such things as global warming, global cooling, the hole in the ozone layer and whatever else they decide to lie about one need only look through the rhetoric at the facts.

I plan to expand this a lot. Feed back desired.

[MakoSDV]

Interesting. I hadn't heard that the DDT problems had been disproved. Do you have references to the research studies? It would really help prove your point in the article.

[Ragnar Danneskjöld]

That's part of what I plan to add to it. I have a book on the way that's supposed to reference all kinds of studies on this and other issues. So once I've read that this will grow more.

[Zovo]

I might suggest you add ALOT more to your piece before implicating Global Warming/Global Cooling (refered to now simply as Global Climate Change) and the Hole in the Ozone as lies.

These are ideas alot of people have grown to know and accept and nobody is going to take you seriously unless you can draw upon some pretty reliable research.

[Ragnar Danneskjöld]

Don't worry about that. I got it covered.

[Neuman]

I've known some pretty ardent environmentalists, and they typically have the notion that untouched nature is a valuable resource that should be preserved for posterity. Thus, this untouched land has a distinct value for humans, not nobody. True, there are nuts who think the world would be better off without any people at all, but to say that these are the only true environmentalists is ridiculous. I doubt there is a "supreme good" or "supreme evil" in environmentalist philosophy, since its main goals are moderation and coexistence.

While DDT is useful in countering malaria, there is no way you can argue that all malaria deaths could have been prevented had DDT not been subject to so many restrictions. And FYI, DDT is currently being used in Africa as a household insecticide and as a treatment for mosquito nets, so it does still have uses. Spraying it all over the place outside doesn't just kill mosquitoes, but pollinators like bees as well, so you do have to be careful how it's used.